And to me this one is so obvious…
| If you had to choose between not having sex (including sexual related activities) for the rest of your life, and being poor, what would you choose? Rich and in celibacy! Lots of sex and no money! |
Um yeah, I would choose Lots of Sex and No Money without even thinking. Oh wait, I have never HAD money 
HOW ABOUT YOU?
Fess up…
ALL OF YOU
Rich. No STD’s, no chance of getting knocked up and hell, as long as there’s chocolate who needs a penis?!
Tee hee!
I do. I need one.
Chocolate doesn’t do it for me.
Batteries though…
…right now I have no money and no sex life, I’d have to say I’ll take either one
“Your lovin’ gives me a thrill. But your lovin’ don’t pay my bills.” Seriously.
Let’s put it this way: If I was rich and, due to some medical condition, unable to perform, *all* my money (if necessary) would be going to fix the latter condition…
show me the money.
Well, I’ve given up money to get sex, but I’ve never given up sex to get money…
$$= lots of batteries…
Call me poor but satisfied.
I am all about the coin.
Well, not really. But since I haven’t had a date since 1932, I guess I’m used to the no sex thing.
So I’ll say rich.
give me the sex